AI Platform Lead · Series B to D

You are rolling out agents.
Your team is drifting.

Every team has its own CLAUDE.md. Every agent has its own rules. You cannot tell which corrections keep firing. That is a behavioral-control problem, not a prompt problem.

If any of this is true, the audit will land
Cursor, Claude Code, or Codex rollout in the last 6 months
5 to 9 internal agents in production
Custom CLAUDE.md per team, ad-hoc rule docs
Platform charter naming AI reliability or governance
Homegrown harness that leaks at scale
Manual correction tracking in wikis or Slack

You are the person holding the drift.

You own the rollout. The rules live in three places. Some teams wrote their own wrappers. Compliance is whatever anyone remembers at the time.

When the agent does the wrong thing, someone corrects it. Maybe they write a new rule. Maybe they ping you. Maybe they just fix it silently and move on. The correction evaporates.

Next week, a different engineer makes the same mistake. The correction fires again. The rule is the same rule. Text rules do not compile into behavior.

What you are missing is not a better prompt file. It is a correction compiler. A place where recurring corrections become structural enforcement that survives across teams and sessions.

Four things your current stack does not give you.

01
Correction recurrence as a first-class signal
We cluster corrections across operators, teams, and sessions. The question "which rule kept failing?" becomes answerable.
02
Runtime enforcement, not a policy dashboard
Tether intercepts tool calls and response deliveries pre-execution. Compiled rules are structurally interposed, not advisory.
03
Keep your harness. Add the compiler.
Tether runs as middleware inside your existing agent runtime. Your harness keeps its shape. Calx becomes the correction compiler.
04
Evidence your CIO will read
Every prevented violation is logged. The weekly report shows what would have shipped without Calx. Procurement becomes a follow-on, not a new sale.

"Instructions are more like guidelines than actual rules. LLMs aren’t deterministic."

cursor community · Hacker News · Feb 2026

The people running the rollouts already know. Our Paper 3 evidence repo catalogs 70+ practitioner reports saying the same thing. Text rules do not compile into behavior.

Start with the workflow you wish you could govern.

Pick one team’s agent rollout. We instrument the correction surface for two weeks, cluster the recurrences, and hand you a behavioral control report with an enforcement plan.

scopeOne platform workflow
accessCorrection stream · read only
durationTwo weeks · async
deliverableBehavioral control report
nextPilot across first team

Other pain shapes.